Leica makes you happy – part 1

There is a tension between the statement that the Camera just a tool and statements from, for example, the highly respected Zack Arias "Fuji kicks Leica's ass". Is the camera important after all? Maybe. But what I know for sure - and I'm sure every reader can confirm - is the importance of the lenses used when taking photographs. Perspective, field of view, isolation, sharpness - everything that makes up a picture depends primarily on the lens that was used.

 

My path to the Leica came through the lens.

When I recently offered my Fuji stuff for sale here on the blog, some people thought they knew that I was now getting a Leica. At the time, I seriously hadn't thought about it for a second. Since the Fuji sale, I have simply used my D800e as my always-on camera. I've only ever looked at Leica cameras from a distance: expensive toys for a few rich people with a whim. Big names in photography only take photos with the overpriced tin box because they are sponsored by Leica – I thought. However, I am happy to admit that I have always been fascinated by the colors of the Leica. However, it was unclear to me whether these were camera dependent or influenced by post-production.

At some point I pressed the wonderful Josh his M in his hand. Of course, I didn't manage to produce even a sharp image and, bored, I handed it back to him. At the opening of Paul Ripke's "Two Minutes of Coincidence" I had the opportunity Paul to ask why he takes photos with a Leica. He answered me that his 24 in the stage pit can best handle the strong spotlight from behind and produces the most amazing lens flares. By the way, he also mentioned that he was not sponsored by Leica.

My curiosity was piqued. I started researching online. At some point I kept stumbling across pictures with a very special look. It turned out that the pictures were taken with a Noctilux.

In a blog post by Steve Huff he shows why he Sony A7r better than his old Leica finds. This blog post, where I liked all the images from the Leica better, and my own experience with them acoustic hazardous waste from the Sony A7 then convinced me: I wanted a Leica. With a Noctilux.

I briefly thought about whether I would rather save a little more to make my dream of a Phase One come true? Apart from the fact that I would have had to pay at least twice as much for it, I realized that I work on the road rather than in the studio. I preferred the small package of camera and lens to the megapixel bolide.

After reading a lot, I spent a few more sleepless nights wondering whether the Leica path was actually the path that would take me further in photography. Because one thing is clear: I have a wonderful armada of great Nikon and Zeiss lenses from 10,5mm to 400mm for my D3, D4 and D800e. I am equipped with flash units, monopods, remote releases and nodal point adapters and can solve many photographic problems with ease. Starting something new now only makes sense if it brings me something. If it helps me to make a way out for the photographic ideas in my head - until the click.

At some point I presented my ideas and thoughts to my loved one, who always has a wonderful, empathetic and clear view when making such a decision. She nodded.

I'm used to buying photographic equipment for a lot of money. Between a D4 that was recently released on the market and a Leica M, the price of a small XQD memory card is just about the same. But when I stood in the shop and began my Leica journey, my hands were still sweaty.

I only removed the protective film from the display days later.

A new journey had begun...

Part 2 on Monday : )

  1. At the end of the day, a rangefinder is always a rangefinder and in order to counteract this, Sony still has to improve its eViewfinder by several levels - so there is no threat of competition at the moment.

    So I warmly congratulate, I also know that you don't need a car in Hamburg and I stick to my claim that the rangefinder of the Zeiss Ikon ZM is much nicer anyway, but that's another story... and Josh just has too much stuff! 😉

  2. In addition to the coloring, I'm always impressed by the plasticity. The simpler the object, the better the Leica lenses. A tomato, a bit of fruit, or wet leaves and tears come to your eyes. Leica also makes me happy.
    I always say: she can't do anything, but the photos are awesome!

  3. Congratulations and welcome to the club! It was "only" an M8 and the Summilux and it's not easy to take photos with the Leica but it's fun and the results are great. I have to say one thing though: just before I bought mine I was out and about in Neustatt with you, Steffen and Stephan (about 3 years ago) and you weren't that impressed (except Stephan). Steffen even said that you can't do point and shoot with it and that's why it's stupid 😉 How times change. I hope you have lots of fun with it, at least as much as I have with mine 🙂

  4. Congratulations!!
    Somehow you had to become a Leica man. Your style of photography matches the technology. Leica was a corporate customer of ours. Not easy to endure a factory tour and the photo exhibition on site without placing an order...

  5. The Noctilux turned me off from the start. I had it to test for a few days. Too heavy and blocks too much view in the viewfinder. More of a prestige lens.

    But the Leica 50mm Summilux has the most enchanting bokeh I have ever experienced. For that alone it was worth buying an M.

  6. Let me know if you want to sell more Nikon stuff 😉

    No seriously, sounds great! The Nocti really seems to be something very special. I always think it's great when you find something that you can continue to grow and learn from.

  7. Very nicely written article, then I nervously researched the prices and it was clear: many of those who read your article will have to find their happiness elsewhere! Me too! I hope you enjoy using the camera!

  8. Almost three years ago, I was given an M8 by a Swiss during a photography course on Sylt and it only took 60 minutes before I was hooked. As soon as I got back to Hamburg, I financed a used M8 with a 35 cron. Since then, the 5d MK II has been lying around and is only taken out of the closet every now and then.
    After less than 2 years, the desire to buy my own new M arose.
    I've been traveling with the Type 240 and a 50 Lux since mid-November and I'm absolutely thrilled. This is the tool for my style of photography.
    At some point you get used to justifying the price of the station wagon...
    I hope you have fun with the brick 🙂

  9. Even though I think you write really well, make us jealous with lots of pictures! I would also like to see a comparison with one of your Nikons! For me it's not about counting pixels, but rather about the atmosphere of the images!

  10. "...I kept stumbling across pictures with a very special look..."

    I'd be interested to know. What is the special look? And how does it manifest itself? Can this be proven using images that clearly show a "special look" with the same focal length, for example compared to a D800? On the one hand, I'm also internally enthusiastic and emotions play a big role in this - it's not for nothing that the blog post is called "Leica makes you happy" and not "Leica takes sharper, higher-contrast and better images".
    As a scientist and also a hobby photographer, the question is about the “feeling” but just as much about the facts. Hence my question:

    Are there examples, images that were taken in comparison to other cameras that clearly show that Leica creates a very special look here??? Or do we look at these Leica photos and evaluate the very special style of the owners and photographers and wish to take photos that way and attribute it to a special technique?

    Maybe I'm making a big fuss about this post, but maybe there will just be a few links to evidence and pictures that will simply convince me and make me put aside this skepticism.

    Until then, great post so far!!!! I'm looking forward to the rest!

    Regards
    rob

  11. Great site - I first got to know an M10 and the new Noctilux at my camera dealer.
    Fascinating piece. If it weren't for the vile Mammon. When looking through your images, the 3D effect is not as pronounced as it could be achieved. The part would be a burner especially for concert photography, in semi-dark lighting like in churches and locations. I use a much cheaper X-Vario, but if handled correctly, this pulls the fur over Nikon and Co.'s ears. A little subtle Lightroom editing and the images are Leica Like. I can only confirm your opinion about Leica lenses. World class in every way. Color neutral and image quality at open aperture. If I need to take quick pictures then my Sony A99 with Sigma ART lens is used. That's not a joke as the Bavarians say, but Leica is unrivaled.

    LG. Tom Gergelyi

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked