Easter greetings

Easter greetings with the realization that the Fuji X100s produces incredibly soft images in the macro range when the aperture is open.

Manual focusing works very well. The camera has several aids when focusing without autofocus. I find the cross-sectional image – with an additional enlargement option – helpful for larger objects. With such small elements, like the inside of the flower here, the so-called focus peaking - in German translation at Fuji this means Glanzlicht - is a good assistant to be able to determine whether the image will be in focus before taking the shutter.

Light is necessary for all focus modes. Even if the autofocus hits quite quickly, it is not comparable to a digital SLR camera. On the one hand, this is due to the focus sensor, which is not cross-shaped, but only runs in one direction. Sometimes it is necessary to focus the camera in portrait format...

In addition, the autofocus requires a lot of light. Even if the Fuji X100s certainly do Useful results at ISO6400 it may not be able to focus automatically. For comparison: the AF on my Nikon D4 focuses very reliably even at ISO25600 - but it also costs a few thalers more 😉

You can see the flower picture here in the jpg version, as it comes directly from the camera. I also photographed it in RAW format, but the image – not surprisingly – has no reserve in terms of sharpness. However, you can use the Fuji's RAW to save some of the tonal loss in bright areas. While a Nikon D800 can cover an insane exposure range at low ISO values, the Fuji The last time I experienced this was with the CCD sensor on the Nikon D100. The newer CMOS sensors from Nikon - and certainly Canon too - cope with overexposure quite well. With the Fuji X100s you have to expose more precisely. But it works pretty well, thanks to the very reliable automatic exposure.

After a brief outline of some of the shortcomings of the Fuji X100s, I wish you a peaceful Easter and turn my attention back to mine Easter reading...

X100s

  1. The thing about the soft macro image is also in the instructions, if I remember correctly. Fuji suggests stopping down to at least f4.

    You can get overexposure under control with DR200 or DR400. The sensor has more reserves in the depths. A slight underexposure is therefore an advantage in high DR situations 😉

    Happy Easter 🙂

    1. Thanks for your tips. However, DR200 and DR400 cannot be adjusted at low ISO values. The effect of higher dynamic range is achieved by increasing the bass. That's all well and good, but that's why the tonal value changes in brightness are still unsightly and different than with my Nikons. I didn't write anything more 😉

      1. The X-Trans sensors prefer slight underexposure at DR100 and low ISO values ​​because they show more depth in the depths.

        And at least with my FF Canon I don't see any advantage in terms of heights, but they are also known for their relatively low DR range. Nikon is definitely better...

  2. I can see Stefan, we're both going back and forth between reading, books, coffee and X100s this holiday season 🙂

    Share your experiences above as well.

    Wish you a happy holiday up there in Hamburg!

    Kind regards from Taunus

    Jörg

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked