Nobody probably goes into the cool water with their camera voluntarily - not even at these temperatures. Underwater photography is fantastic, but a very expensive and time-consuming variant of photography. Christian recently introduced me to one Water bag from DiCAPac WP-S10 attention, which of course I wouldn't use for real underwater photography, but this water bag is completely sufficient to bring your own camera near the water and also under the water surface. This can then produce great results. Here is an experience report.
My D3 isn't one of the smallest cameras, but it fits in the bag - but the lens has to be pushed through the front opening and then screwed onto the bayonet in the bag. This is a bit fiddly and should only be done with great care after contact with the water so that no drops of water get into the inside of the camera housing.
The operation of the camera inside the water bag works, but not particularly well. So it's best to use an automatic mode if you have to work in changing lighting conditions.
I worked with a strong wide angle because the autofocus is quite difficult underwater. With a wide angle, the field of focus is simply larger.
It is a bit annoying that the front lens of the water bag cannot be connected to the lens. In order to avoid unnecessary reflections and vignetting, you should bring the front lens close to the lens by holding the camera appropriately.
My pictures were taken at a triathlon event during the competition. If you use your camera and water bag under more controlled conditions you can certainly take better photos, but my pictures should be enough for a first impression 🙂
Very chic. Now I'm thinking about buying a water bag for my Baltic Sea vacation :)
I really like your experiments.
Nice thing and definitely affordable. Your photos will make you want to imitate them!
and one step further! Excellent!
I like it very much. You can definitely get it as a gift. 🙂
I would be really interested to see how it would work with pretty girls +50mm in a swimming pool.
I've been toying with the bag for some time.
By D3 do you mean a Nikon D3 (probably a stupid question) I have only found smaller bags at a higher price so far. My Nikon D300s doesn't fit in there.
If your bag is larger and also cheaper, that would be ideal.
Regards
There are no stupid questions. Yes, I mean the Nikon D3. So also fits the Nikon D3s and D3x. And certainly also to the other Nikon bodies - although probably only without a battery grip.
@Stefan Groenveld,
I can take the battery handle off… why? The D3(s/x) has one on it as standard...
Regards
It's just a guess because the D700 including the battery grip is larger than the D3.
@Stefan Groenveld,
I've ordered the part now. I'll send you the first pictures as soon as the thing is here =)
I'm looking forward to it 🙂
Yes, things like that are fun. Just be careful with plastic bags. Over time, leaks are inevitable. I also think the first pictures are very successful. I'm looking forward to more photos.
Best regards,
Adrian
Great pictures, thanks for the tip.
What focal length is that? Does the new 16-35 from Nikon fit in there? I couldn't find any measurements anywhere...
Thank you!
Thank you!
The pictures were taken with a 17-35, which is a little shorter than the 16-35, but I still had room in the water bag.