Of course, all digital cameras can perform automatic white balance. As a rule, you get good photographic results this way.
However, there are situations in which the automatic system produces incorrect results. A gray card helps here for correction. The gray card is a seemingly overpriced piece of cardboard - the special thing is that the cardboard reflects exactly 17,68% light. Because of the necessary accuracy, the gray card is also correspondingly expensive.

As you can clearly see, the image has become too blue. This is particularly noticeable on the head of the blue tit, because the plumage on the side of the head is actually white.
Our human eye compensates for the changed light composition and sees the situation without the color cast. However, the camera's automatic system is overwhelmed at this point. Getting the color shift out again later in image processing is very laborious. It's quicker and much easier with a gray card.
There are two ways to work with a gray card: either you hold it in the picture and then correct the white balance in the usual RAW editing programs or you calibrate the camera using a gray card - but this is not possible with all cameras. (Please take a look at the user manual.)

Of course, it is nicer if the camera allows individual calibration. You should photograph the gray card out of focus. To find out how the rest of the calibration works, please refer to your camera's operating instructions. The advantage is that you can also take photos in JPG, because the white balance is then adjusted exactly to the lighting conditions.
In both applications, care should be taken to ensure that the light composition changes quickly in the evening hours and that the white balance should therefore be done more often.
The result of the individual white balance looks like this:

Hi Stefan,
The manual white balance works perfectly with the gray card under normal lighting conditions.
But I have another problem.
In very poorly lit sports halls (district league, state league, etc.) there are two types of artificial light lamps, half bluish, the other half reddish. So far I haven't been able to find an optimal Kelvin number that suits me through trial and error.
Either the photos become too red or too blue.
Even with the gray card I don't get a convincing result. I would be very grateful if you could give me a tip on how to determine a clean white balance under artificial indoor lighting with two different types of lamps. I haven't tried Expodisc or Vivicap to determine the white balance yet.
Kind regards
Stefan
@Stefan, Hello Stefan 🙂
The same problem exists in the Color Line Arena. And you can't determine the correct color temperature using a gray card or any other means. Why? Because it is constantly changing.
The two lamps emit different wavelengths that are out of phase. This means that the combined color temperature changes constantly. The human eye does not perceive the differences, but the camera's short exposure times do. And the camera's automatic system cannot "compute" them quickly.
Conclusion: take any one and correct it in the EBV if necessary.
Regards
Stefan
OK, thank you very much for the quick feedback. 😉
Then I will manually set a Kelvin value that is acceptable to me in the camera and force the photos to be corrected in the EBV.
By the way, is there a technical justification for why two types of lamp lighting are installed in many halls? TV cameras would have to have problems too, right?
Regards
Stefan